Next week, from 26-29 April 2017, the European Society for Intercultural Theology and Interreligious Studies will be holding its bi-annual conference. This time in Münster, Germany. There is an excellent line-up of speakers (including amongst more illustrious folk my good self). For those interested here is the lineup:
I was recently asked to prepare a slide showing all my book covers for a presentation my boss was doing about our programme’s research profile, and just because I think it looks quite nice am sharing here 😉
hopefully may also inspire someone if they feel like reading one or more too 😉
Just to quick note to point to recent RSIS Commentaries on the London terror attack in March outside parliament.
The first to appear was by myself, titled as the headline here, which looks at the way such events may be spoken of in the public sphere. It is available on my academia.edu website here:
The second was by my colleague Assoc Prof Kumar Radhakrishna which notes the wider issue of what he terms “the weaponisation” of “everyday life” and looks at the potential likely rise of such lone-wolf attacks which do not rely on sophisticated weaponry but use cars, knives, and other things we can readily access:
When I offered an update on my Towards Better Disagreement: Religion and Atheism in Dialogue book last month I hadn’t seen this report of the event itself, so for a write up of my talk along with the scripts from my atheist and Muslim respondents, see here:
Not sure if its just me but I think I look slightly like I’m gazing into the lights of an on-coming car in this photo and just frozen, paralyzed to the spot.
On the sidelines of this year’s SRP (Studies in Interreligious Relations in Plural Societies Programme) Symposium, Channel News Asia recorded this episode of Between the Lines documentary with Profs Lipner, Liow, Nasr, and Yan from (respectively): Cambridge University and SRP, RSIS; RSIS; John Hopkins University; Shanghai Academy of Religious Studies.
The topic was Politics and Religion and can be watched here:
Is it possible for atheists and people with a religious conviction to dialogue and converse with civility?
Is it possible for atheists and people with a religious conviction to see each other’s point of view, and recognise the validity and integrity of the other’s opinions?
There certainly are grounds for believing that this is possible and events which bring both sides together do take place. For instance, dialogue events between the two sides have taken place, as this report shows:
Moreover, at the launch of my book Towards Better Disagreement: Religion and Atheism in Dialogue, a panel discussion was held with a local Muslim and the founder of the Humanist Society of Singapore. The event is noted here:
While photos from it were previously posted on this blog, see:
To find out more why not check out Towards Better Disagreement, available on the publishers website or via Amazon, Book Depository, etc.:
On those sites you can check out the advance reviews by such figures as the atheist philosopher Michael Ruse or the leading theologian Ian Markham.
One of the first online reviews is the following:
While on Goodreads it got a 5*:
And a 5* on Amazon.co.uk:
My review of Alan Carling, ed., The Social Equality of Freedom and Belief, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016 is now available on the “Reading Religion” website of the AAR. You can read it here:
This book adds to discussions around the freedom of religion and belief and law and legislation relating to this. My review is a a bit of a mixed bag for it: some very good surveys but also some poorer chapters.
Last month I attended a short conference in Birmingham about Multiple Religious Belonging and ways that church institutions react to it, and can learn to be more welcome to people with such dual/ multiple/ hyphenated identities or belongings.
Some interesting and useful reflections can be found in the links below. First, there is a blog post by the Comparative Theologian Michelle Voss Roberts on what Queer Theory can bring to the table, and then a link to a paper I have written which argues that a particular Western, Protestant, and monolithic conception of religion shapes the way we think and talk about this and looks to the Chinese context for ways of thinking differently about it. Hope these prove useful and fruitful for readers:
A recent publication of mine explores Buddhist-Christian encounters and relations – or more specifically an interreligious, intercultural, or comparative theology – with particular attention to the way that Christology can be rethought through the example of various Chinese (suffering) bodhisattvas.
The paper tries to advance beyond the usual Jesus as bodhisattva explorations in various ways. For one, it deals with actual figures, myths, and stories that resonate with Lived Religion rather than elite textual and philosophical conceptions. For another, it tries to mediate the notion of Jesus on the cross in interreligious relations, taking it as a difficult example especially within Buddhist-Christian encounters.
It also plays around with ideas of suffering saviours and whether bodhisattvas in the Mahayana tradition, who are often seen to have transcended suffering, actually can be spoken of as suffering in some form. Notions of pain and embodiment also enter into the debate.
I hope people will enjoy and appreciate. The final version is in the journal Buddhist-Christian Studies so a link to an uncorrected (but basically finished) draft on my academia.edu page is below.
P.s. If anyone knows a good interreligious artist I could see this benefitting from some suitable artwork – and also maybe for another project I have stemming from this and some other comparative theological work.
Those excellent folks at the Religious Studies Project have produced a very good recent podcast on radicalisation by Matthew Francis of CREST which is well worth listening to:
I have done a short response to this which is also on the RSP website:
Hope you enjoy these.